DANIEL MC CONVILLE died last year under strange circumstances in Maghaberry Prison just outside Belfast

Officialdom says he committed suicide.

His father says that he was beaten to death by a prison officer.



Daniel was 23 but had a mental age of 16.

He was in prison because he was caught with a small amount of cannibal resin for personal use.

Why was an immature and unwell young man placed in a high security prison for having a small amount for personal use?

When his body was examined by the forensic medic he nose was so badly broken that it was lying flat against his face under his eye.

Eleven prisoners have hade statements about Daniel’s death. There are 35 witness statements in total.

The family have taken the case to the prison ombudsperson and are taking legal advise on legal routes.

I met the father on Tuesday last as I went to visit a parishioner in the prison.

It is clear that the family is heart broken at Daniel’s loss.

One thing is certain – there should be an absolutely thorough and open investigation into how Daniel and others have died in Maghaberry.

As Christians Jesus tells us that we have a massive responsibility to care for and visit prisoners.

If you can’t go to prisons – you can support prisoner’s charities.

From listening to Paul I believe that the possibility of foul play is real possibility and I hope that Daniel RIP and his family get truth and justice.

Has anybody got any knowledge or views about this tragedy?




“In the edition of February 14th, 2019 it was wrongly reported in an article that Bishop Pat Buckley has been removed from the list of those authorised to solemnise marriages on behalf of the state. This was incorrect and Bishop Buckley remains on the list of solemnisers.

We would like to apologise to Bishop Buckley for this mistake and make it clear that marriages presided over by Bishop Buckley are validly solemnised.

It is the police of The Irish Catholic to correct errors when they occur”.



Vatican opens archives on controversial WWII pope

Pope Francis wants Pius XII, accused of not condemning Holocaust, ‘correctly’ judged

Harriet Sherwood Religion correspondent The Guardian

Vatican archives on Pope Pius XII, the controversial wartime pontiff accused of failing to condemn the Holocaust, are to be opened next year after pressure from campaigners and historians.
Pope Francis announced the archives would be unsealed in March 2020, eight years ahead of schedule, saying the Roman Catholic church was “not afraid of history”.

Vatican hopes secret files exonerate ‘Hitler’s pope’

His predecessor had been “criticised, one can say, with some prejudice and exaggeration”, he added.
The role of Pius XII, a staunch anti-communist who became pope in March 1939, six months before war engulfed Europe, has long been questioned by historians.

According to a display in Yad Vashem, Israel’s Holocaust memorial and museum, Pius “did not intervene” when Jews were rounded up and deported from Rome to Auschwitz.
His critics have also said he was enthusiastic about Adolf Hitler’s ascent to power and failed to stand up for priests who spoke out against the persecution of Jews and in many cases helped them and others escape being sent to Nazi concentration camps.
Pius’s public reticence over condemning the Holocaust was despite efforts by many in the church, as well as diplomats from allied countries, to persuade him to speak out.

Francis told staff at the Vatican archive on Monday: “The church isn’t afraid of history – on the contrary, it loves it, and would like to love it even more, like it loves God.”
Pius led the church during one of the “saddest and darkest periods of the 20th century”, the pope said. However, he added, he was confident that “serious and objective historical research will allow the evaluation [of Pius] in the correct light,” including “appropriate criticism”.
Pius’s papacy included “moments of grave difficulties, tormented decisions of human and Christian prudence, that to some could appear as reticent”. But they could be seen as attempts “to keep lit, in the darkest and cruellest periods, the flame of humanitarian initiatives, of hidden but active diplomacy”, said Francis.
In 2009, Francis’s predecessor, Pope Benedict, angered many Jews when he approved a decree recognising Pius’s “heroic virtues”, a first step toward sainthood.
Yad Vashem welcomed the Vatican’s decision to release the archives, saying it had been calling for years for the archives to be opened to “enable objective and open research as well as comprehensive discourse on issues relating to the conduct of the Vatican in particular, and the Catholic church in general, during the Holocaust”.

Iael Nidam-Orvieto, the director of Holocaust research at Yad Vashem, said it was known that Pius did not “publicly condemn the Nazis’ extermination of Jews in direct, clear and unambiguous terms”.
The Vatican may have operated a strategy of “public silence, with behind-the-scenes activity”, but available historical evidence had not confirmed that, she told Haaretz newspaper.
Rabbi David Rosen, of the American Jewish Committee, which has lobbied for more than 30 years for full access to the archives, said the pope’s decision was “enormously important to Catholic-Jewish relations”.
He added: “It is particularly important that experts from the leading Holocaust memorial institutes in Israel and the United States objectively evaluate as best as possible the historical record of that most terrible of times to acknowledge both the failures as well as the valiant efforts made during the Shoah [Holocaust].”
Naomi Di Segni, of the Union of Italian Jewish Communities, said she hoped the material in the archives would “further clarify the position of the church” during the Holocaust.
Six million Jews died in the Holocaust, many after being rounded up and deported to Nazi death camps.


Its very good that Francis is openinh the Pius X11 archives.

The popular opinion, which I share, is that Pius dis not say or do enougb.

And at that time the RCC Good Friday ceremony contained a prayer for the “Perfidious Jews” that prayer was removed by Pope John XX111 as late as 1959.

There is no doubt that the hatred of Jews is a very old hatred that has affected our culture – especially the Catholic / Christian culture of Europe.

Catholics had a fear of Judaism, Communism and Free Masonry.

Sadly, my own father had antisemitic views based on watching a Jewish money lender charging my granny exorbitant interest rates.

I have meen to Israel on a number of occasions and loved it there. The first time I saw Jerusalem I got goose bumps. I could easily live there.

But I am not blind to the scandal of how Israel treats the Palestinians. The two country solution is the answer.

I am looking forward to the experts and historians using the Vatican archives to give us a professional and balanced judgement on Pius X11.

And I will now suspend my views pending the outcom of their investigations.