By ALMUDENA CALATRAVANovember 25, 2019

MENDOZA, Argentina (AP) — Two priests were found guilty on Monday of sexually abusing deaf children at a Catholic-run school in Argentina and sentenced to more than 40 years in prison, in a case that has shaken the church in Pope Francis’s homeland.

A three-judge panel in the city of Mendoza sentenced the Rev. Nicola Corradi to 42 years and the Rev. Horacio Corbacho to 45 years for abusing children at the Antonio Provolo Institute for Deaf and Hearing Impaired Children in Lujan de Cuyo, a municipality in northwestern Argentina.

Corradi, an 83-year-old Italian, and Corbacho, a 59-year-old Argentine, were arrested in 2016. The court also sentenced gardener Armando Gómez to 18 years in prison.

It’s expected that Corradi will remain under house arrest because of his age, while Corbacho and Gómez will be held in a prison in the city of Mendoza.

The verdicts can be appealed.

The judges found the men guilty of 20 counts of abuse, including rape, that occurred between 2005 and 2016 at the school, which has since shut down. The 10 victims were former students and all minors at the time of the abuse. The verdict can be appealed.

Pope Francis has not commented publicly on the case, although in 2017, the Vatican sent two Argentine priests to investigate what happened in Mendoza.

“Thank God there has been justice and peace for the victims,” one of the priests, Dante Simon, told The Associated Press on Monday.

After the sentence was delivered, several victims expressed their joy in the courthouse hallway by jumping and raising their arms in the air, as if they were clapping. They embraced the prosecutors who had investigated their cases.

“I am happy, thank you so much for the battle, because everyone has supported us. … This has changed my life, which is evolving,” said Vanina Garay, 26, speaking with the help of an interpreter.

The case has shocked Argentines — as did the revelation that Corradi had been previously accused of similar offenses at a sister agency, the Antonio Provolo Institute in Verona, Italy, but was never charged.

The Vatican had known about Corradi since at least 2009, when the Italian Provolo students went public with tales of abuse and named names. The Vatican ordered an investigation and sanctioned four accused priests, but Corradi apparently never was sanctioned in Italy.

The defendants, who had pleaded innocence, declined to make statements ahead of the judges’ ruling. They appeared somber as they arrived in the courtroom, with Corradi in a wheelchair, his gaze fixed on the ground.

In a statement, the Archbishopric of Mendoza expressed “solidarity and closeness with the victims and their families, who have reported suffering the most aberrant mistreatment” and vowed to “keep working to ensure that these situations are not repeated.”

The Provolo victims have said they did not feel that the local church or the Vatican were protecting them.

“The Argentine court has given the traumatized children of Provolo a measure of justice that the Catholic Church failed to give them,” said Anne Barrett Doyle, co-founder of the online research database

“We hope the prosecutors now will launch a criminal investigation of the archbishops and other church leaders who knew or should have known that the school was being run by a child molester,” she said.

Doyle also said “the pope too must accept responsibility for the unimaginable suffering of these children. He ignored repeated warnings that Corradi was in Argentina.”

Prosecutor Gustavo Stroppiana was tearful as he said: “None of this can generate joy, but it does bring satisfaction because we were able to judge acts that had been silenced for so many years.”

Simon, the investigator sent by the Vatican, had previously told The Associated Press that the pontiff expressed his sadness about the case and told him that “he was very worried about this situation.”

In a report submitted earlier to the Vatican, Simon requested the maximum canonical penalty for Corradi and Corbacho, that they be made to “resign directly by the Holy Father.” His report must be reviewed by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.

Former male and female students testified that the priests touched and sometimes raped them in their dormitories and school bathrooms. They also said they were forced to look at pornographic images. They said they were warned to keep quiet.

Investigators found records of complaints made by parents that weren’t followed up, photographs of a naked girl on Corbacho’s computer and chains he allegedly used to subdue one girl.

Many in Argentina have asked why Francis did not remove Corradi as the authority at the Mendoza school once he learned of the allegations in Verona.

Corradi’s name appeared publicly in 2009, when 67 people said they were abused at the Verona institute by 24 priests, lay people and religious brothers, and specifically said Corradi was in Argentina.

In 2012, the diocese of Verona asked for forgiveness from the victims and sanctioned 24 of the accused, although Corradi was not among them. None of the cases ever went to trial.

Corradi’s name appeared again in 2014 in a letter written to the Pope by deaf students in Verona that reiterated the potential danger he posed in Mendoza.

Corradi is also being investigated in the province of Buenos Aires, where alleged abuses occurred in the Provolo Institute of the city of La Plata. The priest ended up there after Verona, but before he went to Mendoza. Victims’ families believe Corradi’s movements reflect the practice of the Catholic church to transfer from one place to another priests accused of abuse.

In another case that raised questions for the pontiff, a bishop once close to the pope has announced he would arrive back in the country Tuesday to respond to prosecutor’s allegations of sex abuse.

Zanchetta with Francis

Bishop Gustavo Zanchetta’s canon law attorney, Javier Belda Iniesta, said the bishop would fully cooperate with authorities.

A prosecutor accuses Zanchetta of “aggravated continuous sexual abuse” of two seminarians, charges that carry a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison. He has denied the charges, which don’t involve minors.

The Vatican insists the first accusation of actual sex abuse was only lodged against Zanchetta in late 2018. But AP and the Argentine newspaper El Tribuno have reported that documents and testimony from diocesan officials raised credible allegations of inappropriate sexual misconduct well before then.


The abuse of children is always an unmitigated evil.

The abuse of children, already carrying the extra burden of a disability, is to pile on further evil.

The abuse of children by a priest, who is present in a community as a representative of Jesus is not only evil but a blasphemy.

The cover up of abuse by bishops and religious superiors compounds the abuse, introduces a second level of abuse, is deeply immoral and should be treated as a grave criminal offence attracting serious sentences.

In the case of Argentina, the home country of the pope, is a stain upon the diocese and bishop of Rome.

One is led to wonder if abuse and the cover up of abuse, is the reason Francis has not returned to Argentina since being elected Pope?

Is Francis afraid that his immoral and criminal past would be highlighted by such a visit?

Is Francis therefore, a fugitive from Argentina?


Isn’t it wonderful that the world is being freed from the satanic stranglehold of Rome and her filthy Romanist pimps?
These parasites have had their deceiving, evil day.
Now comes JUSTICE. 😎
(Just observin’, like. 😆)


1.27: Vengeance is mine says Magna, the great cava. The drunkard in the early hours of the morning having been pimped himself goes awry and abuses all before him. We are suppose to believe that he speaks with moral integrity. No, No, No. It’s with an evil intent he speakers to spew, like vomit (which is a drunkard’s hourly habit) his poison and venom. The narrative of hatred is the same every time: he just gets nastier and sadly, unbeknownst to himself, becomes a lesser human being. Other commentators make legitimate – often painfully truthful – observations but in an intelligent, rational and respectful way. Vulgarity has no place in meaningful dialogue. Once a reject, always a reject. Ora pro nobis Sancta Sacerdotes. Deux auxilium vobis Magna. A vita autem fatuus.


1.27: Insomniac Cartwheel. 🎃🎃🎃🎃🎃 – pumpkin head, if you spent some time praying contemplatively you would sleep better. 🦊🦊🦊🦊 – miaow, miaow..😂😂😂😂😂 – only joking…


=Pat wrote, 111November – “This video – it’s really worth watching it all – will summarise for you what the SAC sex abuse crisis has done to the RCC.”
And it’s well worth watching agaain.


RE: “GDPR 2018”.

Please see below details from the Archdiocese of Dublin regarding “GDPR 2018” and the accessing of any personal data held in its archives.

As there is a certain individual – with a vested interest – posting misleading comments here regarding the amount of information that is revealed on any released documents, I want to categorically state THAT THE ONLY REDACTED INFORMATION IS NAMES OTHER THAN THE INDIVIDUAL TO WHOM THE DATA REFERS.


You will receive your data within one month of submitting the request and can receive same via email or registered post or both.

How do we keep your information safe and accurate?
The Diocese is committed to ensuring your information is secure. In order to prevent unauthorised access or disclosure we have put in place suitable physical, electronic and managerial procedures to safeguard and secure your information. The Diocese uses technical and organisational security measures to protect your data from accidental or intentional manipulation, loss, destruction or access by unauthorised persons. Our security measures are continuously adapted in line with technological developments.

We seek to ensure that we keep your personal data accurate and up to date. However, you are responsible for informing us of any changes to your personal data and other information.

No personally identifiable information is collected on this website from visitors, staff, clergy and volunteers that browse the website for information on our activities. We review these measures regularly.

Unfortunately the transmission of information via the internet is not completely secure. Although we do our best to protect your personal data, any transmission via our website is ultimately at your own risk. Once we have received your information we will use strict procedures and security features to try and prevent unauthorised access to, or unlawful processing or disclosure of, such data.

On written request we will inform you about the data stored about you. Requests for access, rectification, erasure or blocking of personal data will be processed on the basis of applicable legal provisions. Please contact the Data Protection Leader, Holy Cross Diocesan Centre, Clonliffe Road, Dublin 3, D09 P2E7 or email

What are your rights?
You have many rights under Irish Data Protection legislation with regard to the processing of your data.

You have the right to be informed about any personal data that we hold which relates to you, including how we acquired this data and the purpose for which it is used. The right requires that you will be given a copy of all personal data we hold on you when requested. This is known as a Subject Access Request.

To make a Subject Access Request you must complete a Subject Access Request form. No fee is required. The request will be processed as soon as the Subject Access Request form is returned and we will respond to you within one calendar month. Further information and a copy of the form is available from, by phoning (01) 808 7509 or writing to the Data Protection Leader, Holy Cross College & Diocesan Centre, Clonliffe Road, Dublin 3, D09 P2E7.

Under the Data Protection Acts 1988 and 2003 and the GDPR 2018 you have a right to have any inaccurate data held by us rectified free of charge. If you become aware of any inaccuracy in the personal data you have supplied to us please let us know in writing providing evidence of the correct information. We will then update our records accordingly. You can do this by contacting us at

In certain circumstances you have the ‘Right to be Forgotten.’ This means you can request that the Diocese removes any and all references to you from our electronic records and systems. We will comply with such requests in a timely manner, as required by the GDPR, unless other operational or legal obligations require us to retain such data for a particular purpose or period of time.

You have the right at all times to object to the processing of your personal data which you find intrusive, excessive or unwarranted. The Archdiocese will respect your right to do so but may need to continue such processing where required to do so by law or within the terms of an existing contractual agreement.


How does this apply to canonical trials? Could you have information that is stored destroyed before it reaches the vatican?


Don’t cry for me hi young Francisco,🎻 It has got to be addressed. What about Ireland and UK We need to see the rifelers roar and the canons sqeel to an echoe of a church wiped clean. The canons aren’t guns ya know But


Good night hi fly.
Begorra fly don’t cry for me came to mind so it did.
Great minds think alike fly.
There’s one too many loose canons on the prowl still.
Good night fly hi.


1.26: I meant of course to say Magna CACA: Cava as a sparkling champagne wine would be suitable (because of his drink-fests) were it not for Margaret’s (Magna) vulgarity.


The chef at Allen Hall is well known for years for the dishes he serves up, he sometimes offers crabs and sometimes a mean paella


Going to sit down soon for Thanksgiving Dinner. Giving thanks for all the blessings that we receive daily. God is good. Happy Thanksgiving to all.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s