Categories
Uncategorized

THE CHURCH HAD – AND SHOULD HAVE LAY CARDINALS.

A lay cardinal was a cardinal in the College of Cardinals of the Catholic Church who was a lay person, that is, who had never have been given major orders through ordination as a deacon, priest, or bishop.

Properly speaking these cardinals were not laymen, since they were all given what was called first tonsure, which at that time made them clerics and no longer laymen.[1] They were also given minor orders, which were no obstacle to marrying or to living in a marriage previously contracted. The freedom to marry and to live in marriage is likely the reason that cardinals who were not in major orders were popularly, though inaccurately, referred to as lay cardinals.[citation needed]

Examples

Ferdinando I de’ Medici was a lay cardinal for twenty-six years. Even after he succeeded his brother Francesco I de’ Medici as Grand Duke of Tuscany in 1587, he nevertheless remained a cardinal until he married Christina of Lorraine two years later.

Francisco Gómez de Sandoval, 1st Duke of Lerma was created cardinal by Pope Paul V on March 26, 1618,[2] a title that protected him from prosecution, after he was banished from power on October 4, 1618.

Cardinal-Infante Ferdinand of Austria was a lay cardinal for about 20 years from 1620 (about age 10) to his death in 1641.

Marino Carafa di Belvedere was created a cardinal in the consistory of 1801 by Pope Pius VII on the condition that he take major orders. In 1807 he resigned the cardinalate without receiving major orders to marry to produce an heir and maintain the line of descent for his family. He married Marianna Gaetani dell’Aquila d’Aragona and he became prince of Acquaviva.

Teodolfo Mertel, a lawyer and layman, was named cardinal by Pope Pius IX in 1858. He was not a lay cardinal for long, as he received ordination to the diaconate the same year. When he died in 1899 he was the last non-priest cardinal.[4] (Giacomo Antonelli, who died in 1876 as Pius IX’s Cardinal Secretary of State, remained a deacon when named cardinal in 1847.)

In 1968 Pope Paul VI proposed appointing the French Catholic philosopher Jacques Maritain a lay cardinal, but Maritain refused the honour.

Confusion concerning the title of “cardinal”

It is perhaps commonplace to think that the title of “cardinal” is the next order after “bishop” to which a man may be ordained, as “bishop” comes after “priest” and “priest” after “deacon”.

In fact, however, the position of cardinal is not an order to which one can be ordained; rather, a cardinal is simply an elector of the pope and the title is an honorific office in the Church independent of the priesthood.

The original “cardinals” in the first Christian centuries were friends and counsellors of the Bishop of Rome. Some were ordained deacons or priests and some were not. In those days of persecution these men took on the duty of standing at the door of the house where the service and the subsequent agapē feast was being celebrated. They admitted or rejected people hoping to attend the Sacred Liturgy. They also kept watch for soldiers or informers who might interrupt the gathering. Since the word for “hinge” in Latin is cardo they became known as ‘hingemen” – cardinals.[citation needed] Soon many bishops called their advisors “cardinals” but, in time, the pope decreed that only the advisors of the Bishop of Rome could be known by the title “cardinal”.

Changes in canon law

The 1917 Code of Canon Law decreed that from then on only those who were priests or bishops could be chosen as cardinals,[6] thus officially closing the historical period in which some cardinals could be clergy who had only received first tonsure and minor orders.

The same rule is repeated in the 1983 Code of Canon Law, which adds that those who are not already bishops are to receive episcopal ordination.[7] Any priest who has been nominated for the cardinalate may ask for dispensation from the obligation to be ordained to the episcopacy before being created Cardinal, but in practice it is usually Jesuits who ask for and are granted this dispensation.

For example, the dispensation was requested by the theologian Avery Dulles upon being named cardinal by Pope John Paul II in 2001 who granted it.

Subsequently invited to a meeting of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) in 2002, Cardinal Dulles at one point asked for recognition to speak to the bishops from the floor. His quip that he was there “under false pretenses” was greeted by much laughter.

The same dispensation was granted to Roberto Tucci, another esteemed theologian from the Society of Jesus: he was created cardinal in the consistory of 21 February 2001 by Pope John Paul II, whom Tucci had also successfully petitioned not to be ordained to the episcopacy.

With the motu proprio Ministeria quaedam of 15 August 1972 Pope Paul VI ended the conferral of first tonsure and laid down that entry into the clerical state would instead be by ordination as deacon.

PAT SAYS

Power and the abuse of power, is at the heart of the present corruption / sexual crisis in the RCC.

The cure for this is to spread authority and power more widely – widely enough to include the laity at every level.

Lay Catholics, men and women, with gifts and talents, should be admitted to the college of cardinals, vote for the pope and sit on Roman congregations.

Lay people should exercise real power also as diocesan conductors and parish councillors, and not be just “yes” men and women for bishops and PPs.

All the areas of expertise, medicine, psychology, accountancy etc have gifts to bring to the church.

Popes, bishops and pp’s should have their spending approved by properly instituted financial bodies.

Categories
Uncategorized

West Virginia Catholic bishop spent $4.6M renovating mansion where he ‘inappropriately touched young priests’ – fitting it with a sunken bar, a wine cellar and a $20K dining table – before church quietly sold it for only $1.2M after he was fired 

Megan Sheets Daily Mail

Bishop Michael J Bransfield resigned as head of the Catholic Church in West Virginia last year amid allegations of sexual and financial misconduct

He was barred from public ministry by Pope Francis earlier this year

A secret report later revealed how Bransfield spent more than $2.4million in church funds on personal travel, luxury items, liquor and prescription drugs

He also spent $4.6million on renovations his diocese-owned home in Wheeling

The renovations included adding a climate-controlled cellar, heated floors in the bathrooms, five bay windows and refurbished fixtures

He also added a bar space in the basement, where he allegedly groomed and inappropriately touched young seminarians

After the allegations against Bransfield were made public over the summer, the diocese sold the Wheeling residence for $1.2million in August

Former Bishop Michael J Bransfield spent $4.6million renovating the church-owned mansion in West Virginia where he is accused of making unwanted advances on young priests. After Bransfield’s resignation in September 2018, the Diocese of Wheeling-Charleston sold the home for just $1.2million

A disgraced bishop spent $4.6million renovating the mansion where he allegedly made advances at young priests before the church quietly sold the property for just $1.2million.

Bishop Michael J Bransfield resigned as head of the Catholic Church in West Virginia in September 2018 amid allegations of sexual and financial misconduct. He was barred from public ministry by Pope Francis earlier this year.

A secret report later revealed how Bransfield spent more than $2.4million in church funds on personal travel, luxury items, liquor and prescription drugs – along with $4.6million on renovations to his diocese-owned home in Wheeling, where he allegedly groomed and inappropriately touched young men during his 13-year tenure as Wheeling-Charleston Diocese bishop.

After the allegations against Bransfield were made public over the summer, the diocese sold the Wheeling residence it had provided for him to David H and Meredith McKinley for $1.2million in August, according to Ohio County real estate records. David is the son of Congressman David B McKinley.

Church officials said they conducted the sale privately – without a real estate agent or online advertising – to avoid paying commission. The officials emphasized that the proceeds from the sale would go toward supporting programs for survivors of sexual abuse.

The private sale also had another effect: It kept the public from seeing just how extravagant Bransfield’s mansion was.
A Washington Post article published Sunday offers an inside look at the 9,200-square-foot Colonial Revival-style home – once known as Elmcrest – that Bransfield spent millions of dollars retrofitting with lavish amenities including a sunken basement bar, temperature controlled wine cellar and $20,000 dining room table.

Pictured is the 9,200-square-foot Colonial Revival-style home in Wheeling that Bransfield spent millions of dollars retrofitting with lavish amenities including a sunken basement bar, temperature controlled wine cellar and $20,000 dining room table

The diocese offered the mansion at 52 Elmwood Place to Bransfield when he was installed as bishop in 2005. Just before he moved in, a plumber accidentally started a fire which caused $700,000 in damage.

Six people who worked on the home described to the Post how what was intended to be a modest renovation to repair the damage ballooned into an extensive, costly undertaking at Bransfield’s insistence.

‘It was always, “this” or “that” is what the bishop wants,’ said Jim Baller, the construction manager during most of the renovation.

Baller said Bransfield insisted on landscaping a large portion of the seven-acre property, planting trees to create a buffer between the home and a nearby interstate and installing a fish pond and waterfall as the focal point of the grounds.

Inside the home, Bransfield requested heated floors and jets in the master bathroom, five bay windows, a sun room, refurbished fixtures and a climate-controlled wine cellar with room for hundreds of bottles.

The unfinished basement was transformed into a sunken basement bar, where Bransfield allegedly plied young priests with alcohol and made unwanted advances on them.

Bransfield wanted the bar to be modeled after the cocktail lounge in entertainer Bob Hope’s Hollywood home.

‘The bishop said he wanted to bring clergy into the room and make a pleasant place where they could play cards,’ Denis Gill, the lead architect on the project, told the Post.

A crew of 25 to 30 masons spend a year constructing a stone fireplace in the basement, Baller said.

The Vatican investigation detailed how Bransfield would host lavish dinner parties at his home. Guests were seated in front of a massive portrait of the Last Supper as they dined on meals prepared by a personal chef.

After dinner, Bransfield would invite guests down to the basement bar, where he downed a half-bottle of Cointreau or more out of a tea cup, along with opioids like oxycondone.

‘Dinner guests who only visited occasionally were not invited to join the Bishop in the basement for after-dinner drinks, but he expected his Priest-Secretary, the Vicar General, overnight guests, and certain of his “favorite” young priests . . . to sit in the basement and be in his company,’ investigators wrote in the report.

‘One witness described this as “watching the Bishop watch television”. It was a ritual that none of the witnesses who experienced it reported that they enjoyed.’

The report includes an account from one seminarian who said he loathed staying at Bransfield’s home and ‘described multiple instances of overly aggressive hugs in which the Bishop would grab and squeeze various parts of the witness’s body’.

Witnesses also said that Bransfield would often invite guests upstairs to show them portraits of himself with important figures in the church, some of which were hung in his bedroom.

Bransfield ‘denied engaging in any sexual harassment or sexual activity with any priest or seminarian, either verbally or suggestively by his conduct’, the report states.

Bransfield (pictured in 2016) resigned as head of the Catholic Church in West Virginia in September 2018 amid allegations of sexual and financial misconduct. He was barred from public ministry by Pope Francis earlier this year

When questioned about the renovations by the Post, Bransfield said he didn’t ‘know anything about’ the exorbitant spending on the home and declined to comment further.

Speaking to Vatican investigators who compiled the report on his alleged misconduct, Bransfield said he didn’t have much say in the renovations and blamed subordinates for the high costs.

Investigators wrote that Bransfield’s ‘version of events is inconsistent with a number’ of other witness accounts.
The Diocese of Wheeling-Charleston also blamed Bransfield for the costly renovations when approached for comment by the Post.

‘The former bishop engaged in a luxurious lifestyle and misused diocesan funds, both in conducting his official responsibilities, and personally, when no official purpose was involved,’ spokesman Tim Bishop said.

Baller said that the renovations were not well-received by the community, which saw the home as a prime example of overspending by the church.

‘I’m a Catholic — I’m a parishioner down the street, and for years it has just bugged me to no end,’ Baller said.
‘I’ve seen them waste all that money on that place and then turn around and ask us every Sunday to donate more, donate more — always asking for money. It’s sickening.’

After the allegations against Bransfield were made public over the summer, the diocese sold the Wheeling residence (pictured) for $1.2million in August

The home was purchased by David H and Meredith McKinley (pictured). David is the son of Congressman David B McKinley
After Bransfield’s abrupt resignation in September 2018, his former home sat vacant for months until David H McKinley, who owns a wealth management firm in Wheeling, approached the diocese about purchasing it.

‘My wife and I had been looking for a home for several years,’ McKinley told the Post.

‘The truth is, there are not a lot of homes of this size and with such characteristics in the Wheeling area. We happened to be in the right place at the right time.’

McKinley also had insider information about the home because his congressman father founded the firm that oversaw Bransfield’s renovations.

The church said four other buyers expressed interest in the property before it was sold to McKinley, but declined to offer additional details.

PAT SAYS

What a life of money, wealth, drugs, sex and power Bransfield treated himself to.

It’s hard to believe that a man like that believed in anyone or prayed to anyone.

He regarded the bodies of his young priests and seminarians as his own private possessions.

I suppose if everyone tells you that you are God’s representative and a “successor to the apostles” you can develop a great sense of your own entitlement and greatness?

We have seen several bishops exposed for their materialistic and promiscuous lifestyle.

We’ve seen it in the USA, Europe etc.

Sure our own Noel Treanor spent up to £ 4 million on his palace in Belfast.

The priesthood needs reform.

But the episcopacy need even more reform.