Reader – Dublin priest ? Writes
“Pat have you heard about the recent meeting of VF’s in the Dublin Diocese.
It was a very happy affair (not) The Archbishop was full of his usual praise for the VF’s and the other priests of the Diocese (Not)
At least one was fired after the meeting for being bold and not agreeing with the Boss.
The other VF’s were not asking questions about the financial agreements made with 43 members of staff in Archbishops House who have been made redundant in the last two weeks, some of whom got at 100K settlement.
The poor VF’s were not at all happy, but the spineless shits said nothing.
Will someone who knows what is actually going on in Dublin call the Charities Regulator or better still CAB”?
The above comment, obviously from a Dublin priest, says how many Dublin priests feel about Dermo.
While he got a good reputation on the handling of abuse his record on the care of priests seem abysmal.
But how can the priests at the recent meeting, representative of the 360 plus priests sit there and not challenge Dermo?
Does he instill that level of fear?
Even in his dying says?
Is it true that he sacked one VF for standing up to him the other day?
And these 43 being made redundant.
How have they suddenly become redundant?
Were they in 43 positions created by Dermo for his pets?
Are they getting up to 4.3 million in redundancy payments?
Even John Charles McQuaid, tough as he was was famous for being very pastoral and caring for his priests.
Has Dermo bought a new pad in Dublin yet?
Will he be spending more time in Rome?
The new archbishop will surely have to make the care of the priests Priority Number One.
DUBLIN VF WHO RESIGNED AFTER MEETING WITH DIARMUID
Father Andrew O’Sullivan