Irish Archbishop Who Died in ’73 Is Linked to Abuse

New York Times 2011

DUBLIN — The former archbishop of Dublin, John Charles McQuaid, widely regarded as the most powerful Catholic prelate in modern Irish history, stands accused of serial child sexual abuse, The Irish Times newspaper said Thursday.

Two specific complaints and a separate unspecified “concern” against an unidentified cleric were reported to the Murphy Commission, a state-sponsored investigation into the handling of clerical sexual abuse of children in the Dublin archdiocese. The newspaper reported that Archbishop McQuaid, who retired in 1972 and died a year later, was the unidentified cleric.

The commission published its main report in 2009, but it said that “due to human error” the latest allegations emerged only in a supplementary report published in July. This does not name Archbishop McQuaid, but the newspaper is adamant that the allegations of abuse contained within it refer to the archbishop. One allegation is regarding abuse of a 12-year-old boy in 1961.

“The supplementary report records that in June/July 2009, as the commission was completing its main report, it received information which would have ‘brought another cleric’ within its remit,” Patsy McGarry, the newspaper’s religious affairs correspondent, said in an interview. The archdiocese “found a letter ‘which showed that there was an awareness among a number of people in the archdiocese that there had been a concern expressed about this cleric in 1999,’ the report states. The ‘cleric’ is Archbishop McQuaid.”

The main body of the Murphy report was highly critical of Archbishop McQuaid’s attitude toward abuse, accusing him of showing “no concern for the welfare of children.” However, this is the first suggestion that the official body had received specific complaints against Archbishop McQuaid, who was at the very apex of the Roman Catholic Church in Ireland for three decades.

In a statement, a victims’ group, One in Four, called for a statutory inquiry into the accusations, saying that “if Archbishop McQuaid was, as is alleged, a sex offender himself, then it is no wonder that the secrecy and cover-ups which have characterized the church’s handling of sexual abuse was so entrenched.p

The archdiocese told the newspaper that the police were investigating the matters dealt with in the supplementary report. There is also a separate civil action being taken against the archdiocese by one complainant.A version of this article appears in print on Dec. 9, 2011, Section A, Page 6 of the New York edition with the headline: Irish Archb


I knew MxQuaid personally and never saw or heard anything that would suggest these allegations are true.

But it does seem that Dublin found allegations of some sort and passed them on for investigation.

When John Cooney published his book on McQuaid he did hear that there were two Gardai files on the matter that had disappeared.

Cooney approached a retired Garda inspector who dealt with the matter.

The inspector closed the door in Cooney’s face.


There is a clerical rumour going about suggesting that Amy Martin in being transferred to Dublin to replace Duarmuid Martin.

One priest said: “Amy is clearing his desk in Armagh”.

I have absolutely no knowledge of the veracity if this rumour.

There is a precedent for this when Cardinal Cullen was moved from Armagh to Dublin.

If its true is is good for Amy’s career and bad for Dublin.

Amy is as useless as tits on a bull.