The word Holocaust is derived from the Greek holokauston, a translation of the Hebrew word ʿolah, meaning a burnt sacrifice offered whole to God.

DERMOT FARRELL of Dublin has appointed a 68-year canon lawyer who tried to deny the Tuam Baby holocaust as parish priest of Berkeley Road in Dublin’s north inner city.

Having worked all his life, as a bachelor, deciding whether men and women trapped in bad marriages should get a church annulment – he is becoming a parish priest for the first time – seven years before his retirement at 75!
In the nterview below Paul Churchill maintains that he is on the side of truth. Of course he means Roman Catholic truth. In the minds of people like him there is no other truth!
In the interview Churchill attemts to deny that the Bon Secours nuns piled 796 uncoffined babies bodies wrapped in Coke like bottles, all on top of each other.
In a letter he wrote at the time he says anyone accusing the nuns, especially the media were doing the work of THE DEVIL!

CHURCHILL’S LETTER SUPPORTING THE NUNS
Everything that Churchill claims about the Tuam Babies has been blown out of the water by Catherine Corless, the local Tuam historian, who has backed up everything she says with extensive documentation and taped interviews of former Tuam internees.

PLEASE, IF YOU CAN, LISTEN TO THE WHOLE INTERVIEW FROM RTE AND JOE DUFFY’S LIFELINE.
https://www.rte.ie/radio/utils/share/radio1/10694519
REFUSING TO ALLOW A COUPLE WHO CARE FOR THE DISABLED TOMARRY IN THE INSTITUTION’S CHAPEL SO THAT THEIR DISABLED CLIENTS COULD ATTEND!
Cardinal refused chapel for wedding
A YOUNG Dublin couple have been refused permission by Cardinal Desmond Connell to marry in the chapel of their choice for reasons…

The Irish Times – Patsy McGarryFri, Dec 7, 2001, 0
A YOUNG Dublin couple have been refused permission by Cardinal Desmond Connell to marry in the chapel of their choice for reasons “too numerous to recount”. They were assured, however, that those reasons were “sufficiently serious to merit what might seem a rather strict regulation”.
Ms Laura Smyth (26), a physiotherapist at a residential centre for people with mental and physical handicap in the city, wrote to the cardinal on November 8th last seeking permission – as is necessary – to be married in the centre’s chapel on February 20th next.
She explained this would mean a lot to herself and her fiancΘ, Mr Michael Cooke (30), as it would “allow my clients, who would not often witness a marriage, to be involved in the day”. She also said that in making the request she had the full support of the centre’s administrator, a member of a religious order.
FATHER PAUL CHURCHILL replied on behalf of the cardinal, on November 12th. He said the cardinal, while appreciating Ms Smyth’s reasons for making the request, “would be unhappy at this stage to change accepted diocesan policy in regard to marriages in private churches and oratories”. The matter had been gone into “very carefully” some years ago by the late Archbishop Ryan, he said.
“The pastoral difficulties and problems that led to this decision are too numerous to recount here, but I can assure you that they were sufficiently serious to merit what might seem a rather strict regulation,” the letter then said.
Replying to Cardinal Connell on December 2nd Ms Smyth said the reason given for his refusal was “not a satisfactory explanation”. She and her fiancee would now “have to explore the alternatives of cohabiting or a civil marriage, neither of which we want but have little choice about at this time” .
Once, again we see Churchill as the mouthpiece of the hierarchy pushing ROMAN CATHOLIC TRUTH!
I dont believe that Paul Churchill is a “bad man”.
But he is a BLIND MAN putting RC teachings, doctrines and laws before compassion.
Would it not have been a human and pastorally wonderful thing to allow the clients of their carers to see their carers married, to be part of the ceremony and to be part of the celebration?
Clients like these probably never see a eedding in their whole lives.
Would Jesus have refused the wedding taking place in a chapel in a facility for the disabled? Absolutely not!
What would Jesus think of those who, like the Pharisees, refused?
Would He repeat what he said before – things like: “brood of vipers”, ” whitened sepulchres”?
“You lay burdens on men’s shoulders and won’t lift a finger to remove them”?
So what qualifies Paul Churchill at 68 to be a parish priest for the first time in his life?
A lifetime defending RC teaching on marriage?
Letters and interviews denying the Tuam Holocaust?
Refusing marriage to disability carers in front of their clients on the basis of a church laws that lays down the only places where marriages can be celebrated?
Would Cardinal Connell and Paul Churchill have allowed Jesus to attend the Marriage Feast at Cana and turn water into wine.
On the basis of canon law – YES!

PS:
Connell was a philosopher who was an expert in the Beatific Language – the language God and the angels use to communicate with each other in Heaven 🤡.
When Connell condemned homosexuality on one occasion the gay activist Senator David Norris came out with a brilliant statement:
“The cardinal seems to know a lot about Angels but absolutely nothing about Fairies” 😜
Cardinals and Canon Liars live in Cloud Cuckoo Land.
SEAN JONES (AKA KING PUCK)AND THE PALLOTINE ORDER.

Does anyone know the circumstances under which Sean Jones left the Pallotine Order in Rome before going to Maynooth as a lay student and eventually being accepted by Kerry?
A contact in Rome is asking.