Categories
Uncategorized

CAN ANYONE TELL ME THE NAMES AND BACKGROUNDS OF THE LARNE PREACHERS OF HATE?

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=178658420971023&id=105075931662606

It would be nice to know WHO and WHAT we are dealing with.

MY POSTERS AGAINST HATE PREACHING:

AND ON THE RC SIDE:

The archbishop of Liverpool wearing a 50 long purple train.

Mc Mahon

PAT SAYS;

I have no problem with people making speeches or preaching on the streets. That is freedom of speech.

But I have a problem with people inviting hatred against individuals and groups.

These Larne preachers are always condemning gay people.

I think that gay people, and all people, should be free to walk in public without their secual ori.entation etc being condemned by loudspeakers.

I believe that such speech should come under hate speech legislation.

I also think that people should keep their religion for their home and their place of worship.

Yesterday, another of these preacher types told me that he had banned his daughter’s same sex partner from the family home.

If God is love, how can a parent turn his back on his daughter and family.

This is hypocrisy.

As someone said on the blog the other day – FUNDAMENTALISM without the FUN.

In society we neex to be SECULAR and PLURAL and shove the foaming at the mouth taliban types back into their church buildings.

192 replies on “CAN ANYONE TELL ME THE NAMES AND BACKGROUNDS OF THE LARNE PREACHERS OF HATE?”

‘Yesterday, another of these preacher types told me that he had banned his daughter’s same sex partner from the family home.’
I used to work with a woman who used to say she would die if her daughter was a lesbian.
Well of course you know what happened next, and the other daughter also stopped talking to her. I had to leave the room whenever she mentioned them to laugh.

Like

I dont know what your point is with his Grace of liverpool pool: he is a former engineer and an extremely nice man. Look at fanny mullaney: bitchy old queen, hates tradition, hates old vestments, soutaines, and only wears polyester zipie albs. He hates dressing as a priest. He’d prefer to be a civil lawyer, but didn’t have the money or brains to pursue that.

Like

Good Lord, please help us all! 🏳️‍🌈Unbelievable!
Malcolm should know better, he’s already got enough fruitcakes to deal with as it is without all that palaver.

Like

That picture has been doctored. Look at the hairstyles of several of them! No way is any of those real.

Like

12:42am
Here! Here! I agree, what does Archbishop McMahon wearing the Cappa Magna have to do with those hate preachers. Contrary to all the mad mods on here, I thought he looked Magnificent.

Like

Sorry, Pat, but I admire and envy the courage of these street preachers. What they are saying is entirely, and absolutely, scriptural. Nowhere, in either the Old or New Testaments, are homosexual acts approved. This is not so for heterosexual acts, unless they constitute fornication.

Like

9.06
Grow up? How? By denying the fact that every scriptural reference to homosexual acts (3 in the OT and three in the NT) condemns them?
Listen, you can accept what Scripture says about these acts, or you can ignore it; but you cannot deny that it has something to say here.
If you are truly a follower of Christ, then you must take seriously his word in Scripture.

Like

There are different interpretations of those scripture passages. Read JJ Mc Neil – The Church and the Homosexual.

Like

By Post Author

Please spare us an MC homily. It’s grotesque coming from his hate-filled mouth.

Like

9.24
Pat, I agree with McNeil that Scripture does not, anywhere in its ocean of words, morally condemn same-sex love; nevertheless, he is wrong to infer from this that it therefore approves same-sex intercourse as a morally legitimate expression of this love. It does not. On the contrary, it expressly condemns these acts.
Paul the Apostle excoriates these acts IN THEMSELVES. Which means that he regarded them as always wrong, regardless of the context in which they take place, including a loving, monogamous, stable gay union.
Personally, I believe that such unions can be the ground in which holiness (yes, holiness) can grow and thrive in the lives of gay couples, but their intention must be to abstain, as best they can, from sexually expressing their love for each other.

Like

Magna @ 10:07 – and who is to say that Jesus was right in his interpretation of scripture and the OT ? Have you not got past the idiocy of ascribing to this historical man Jesus all the silly divine stuff that Christians believe, without evidence. Yes, he was somebody special and if his words are to be taken as his and accurate, then some of what he says makes absolute sense. But, don’t you realise the construction and artifice that has gone in to the NT accounts, evidently with a purpose in mind to make Jesus seem divine or whatever. Do we really believe this literal interpretation and nonsense anymore ? I don’t. I just wish people would apply logic, reason, fact, physics and a little common sense to what they think they believe.

Like

Thank you @ 11.09. What you comment is sensible, logical and to my mind, absolutely correct. This Jesus character, whoever he was, seems to have left a great impression of goodness on many who then, for a variety of reasons and perhaps with good intent, elevated his status into a God.
The psychological and emotional processes subsequently supporting such a belief have been well rehersed many times now on this blog. There is ample evidence that religious beliefs are man made and without foundation in reality. But many, particularly clerics, cling to their drowning straws of blind faith and hope that it all comes good in the end.
MMM

Like

Sorry @ 11.09. I should have directed my comment at 12.03..Don’t spoon feed 12.03. Let him/her check it out if really interested.
MMM

Like

11.09

No Christian believes in the divinity of Jesus without good reason; at least, those who have a personal relationship with him and not with the clergy. Unfortunately, the existence of an intermediary agency, priesthood, has deprived so very many of this relationship and made them dependent on the very men who exploited them and their children and who, actually, were, and still are, themselves in a state of infantilised dependency on the very people they exploit.

The incarnate Jesus did not expect people to take him at his word, even though the Gospel records that listeners marvelled at the authority of his words (a quality acknowledged, too, by some atheists today, including at least one who posts here regularly). So Jesus acted upon his words: he worked wonders, miracles, to show that his words had power beyond those spoken by any other. But it wasn’t enough for some, anymore than it would be today; hence the journey to Calvary.

There are three types of personal reaction to the Gospel: belief/doubt, unbelief, and scoffing. The scoffers would never believe in Jesus’ divinity, even if he descended from Heaven in Elijah’s chariot, gilded with etherally luminescent gold, and did a double backflip while drawing his iriedescent horses to a halt. They would simply rationalise the whole scene away, because God does not exist, right?

Like

To say that Paul is citing the Roman attitude (and all letters were read by non-addressees en route) is not to actually say he “approves”. There is vast ground not spoken. Paul’s writings are about the ascended Jesus, which is where the meaning of prophets about widows and orphans, lies.

Like

11:09am

Outline the logic,reason, fact, physics and common sense to support your views
otherwise it’s more blah blah blah.

Like

@11:09: You certainly need to widen your reading! If interested, check out a few of the many YouTube video debates on religious beliefs.
Maybe you’re more comfortable clinging to your version of truth?
MMM

Like

12:16 pm
I’m not looking for spoon feeding.
If you genuinely seek truth/Truth it might help to be more open minded rather than absolutist, having those absolutist views reinforced by Youtube videos of Keen,
Dawkins, Hitchens, et al, peddling updated 19th century notions for the 21st century market.

Like

12:31pm
Check out Prof. Hans Kungs, “Does God Exist- An Answer For Today”, a
Collins Fount paperback published in 1978. In it Kung outlines and critiques philosophical, anthropological, psychological, sociopolitical viewpoints of masters of modern though.
He also outlines and critiques nihilism as a consequence of atheism while providing alternatives to both nihilism and atheism. It’s 840 pages including notes and references but a brilliant book, well worth working through. Much more informative than the blah blah blah on Youtube!

Like

Yes, MMM, there’s no better place than YouTube for philosophy and theology. 😂😂😂

Like

7.45
Have you never heard of the pagan Pliny’s letter to Trajan?

If I were you I’d familiarise myself with Pascal’s wager. Soon.

Like

Seamus, I accept that someone called Jesus MAY have existed. But there’s no independent historical evidence for him, his actions, miracles etc etc. By independent I mean independent from “believers”, particularly those who allegedly years afterwards wrote about him.
The huge “leap of faith ” in casting him as “God”: well that’s another huge unproven claim
MMM

Like

Did the Jewish historian Flavius Josephus not mention Jesus circa 90 ad

Like

By Post Author

MMM 7:45,
The baptism of Jesus in the Jordan and the crucifixion are supported by nearly universal scholarly consensus.
As BP 7:49 has mentioned, the Jewish historian Flavius Josephus mentioned Jesus circa 90 AD.
Some people know there is an afterlife. Some people take a leap of faith that there is an afterlife. Others do not believe in the afterlife.
It’s is perfectly normal, and to be expected, that someone who doesn’t accept the afterlife will also not accept Jesus Christ.

Like

Virtually no historian today doubts the existence of the historical Jesus. So to continue debating whether Jesus was a real person is a waste of time; in fact, it is time to move on from that ridiculous and discredited canard.

Jesus happened, really. The SENSIBLE question is whether he was divine. This is something each of us must answer for himself/herself. In my opinion, yes, Jesus was divine.

Like

7.45
Believers, MMM? They weren’t believers at the time: they BECAME believers because of Jesus’ works.
Your statement suggests impressionable bias on the part of witnesses when none existed.
Not one of Jesus’ followers believed that he was divine until after his resurrection.

Like

9:48,
They provided a good debate on that topic anyway, whatever about anything else.

MC 10:52,
I read it for free. One of those you can read a few articles a week for free.

Like

Magna @ 9:06 – these are not the words of Jesus, they are words of some wandering Jews with their sheep and goats in the desert, who think that they are inspired by or spoken by God, but in reality are the words they think he spoke or inspired, and so very flimsy and with uncertain foundation. Even the Gospels fall in to this category. Everything has to be sifted and interpreted. And the best we can do now is to realise that the kinds of attitudes that these so called God / Christ inspired words reveal is a woeful ignorance of the human condition, and how people are these days. Otherwise, you would still be sacrificing goats and sheep on an altar, or cutting off your hand or pulling out your eye, or marrying / raping children because you can, or walking across the Channel thinking it was the Red Sea and would part for you. As has already been said, get real, and grow up – both scripturally and theologically.

Like

Well said @ 10:07. Christian clerics cling to scripture as if it was personally written by the Sky Fairy and handed down with great ceremony to the chosen few, the clerics.
The RCC and other biblical students, like Magna seem both dazzled by its ‘brilliance’, but blinded as to its lack of historical authenticity and therefore its verrrry questionable irrelevance.
I took this up yesterday with Magna, found his response poor, replied to say so, and will check now for any further reply.

Like

10.07
Try to be accurate : I referred (not at 9.06, by the way) to BOTH the Old and New Testaments, not only to the former.
And before you write off the Old Testament entirely as the domain of wandering, deluded, sheep-and-goat herders, remember that Christ himself did acknowledge it had divine authority, since he looks to it at times in the Gospel. Don’t throw out this baby with the bathwater.
Incidentally, telling me to ‘get real, and grow up – scripturally and theologically’ might impress you, but it is not a counter-argument.

Like

And yet again, and again Magna, you use Scripture to “prove” Scripture!
Wood and Trees springs to mind.!

Like

Magna, just as a matter of interest (I’m nosy) what bible translation do you usually read? Or do you use Hebrew and Greek?
Thanks.

Like

They could be Baptists, Bp Pat, as I previously commented on seeing a sign advertising “Street Preaching Courses” outside a local Baptist Church in Edinburgh. Poor Edinburgh, first KOB, now this.

Like

Only last week, another vile homophobic preacher was arrested in Leeds city centre to loud cheers. He also had a go at women telling them to remain virgins until they meet their husbands. Even a Muslim man tried to reason with him to no avail.
A spokesperson for the police said: “A 40-year-old male has been arrested in relation to public order offences”, so he must be contravening a public order act in force… but probably only for the din caused by his loudspeakers.
https://www.leeds-live.co.uk/news/leeds-news/moment-shocked-crowd-cheer-vile-21401578

Like

Mr Buckley, the picture of Archbishop Malcom was taken at the FSSP Ordination in Warrington, which he only did so that they wouldn’t invite Cardinal Burke to do it.
He didn’t want him in the Diocese. He absolutely didn’t want to wear it.
You have no idea what your talking about, this site fuels bitterness and ignorance.
There are times when this blog can do good and draw attention to very important things, but there is such an underlying issue, of ignorance and bitterness.

Like

Malcolm is a big fat auld queen. He also looks like the butcher, Fred Elliot, from Coronation St. Both are comedy characters. He kept Betty Turpin supplied with scrag end of lamb for her hotpot.

Like

I am confused, Bp Pat. On the one hand, you (rightly) condemn these foul street preachers, yet you describe Patricia McKeever as “brave.”
In her July 2021 newsletter (page 15), she quotes St Peter Damian on homosexuality as “(it) is never to be compared with any other vice because it surpasses the enormity of all vices. It defiles everything, stains everything, pollutes everything. And as for itself, it permits nothing pure, nothing clean, nothing other than filth.”
In her latest September 2021 newsletter (page 9), she quotes St Bernardine of Siena “no sin has greater power over the soul than the one of cursed sodomy, which was always detested by all those who lived according to God’s law… Such passion for untenable practices borders on madness. This vice disturbs the intellect, unbalances an elevated and generous state of soul, drags lofty thoughts down to base ones, makes men pusillanimous [timid] and irascible [easily angered], obstinate and hardened, servilely soft and incapable of anything. Furthermore, the will, agitated by the insatiable drive for pleasure, no longer follows reason but rather the tumult of the passions… One who lives practicing the vice of sodomy will suffer more pain in Hell than anyone else, because this is the worst sin that exists.”

Like

1: “It is never to be compared with any other vice because it surpasses the enormity of all vices”. — YES, sounds about right! It’s the best, dear! Don’t knock it until you’ve tried it 😂
—
2: “It defiles everything, stains everything 🙄, pollutes everything. And as for itself, it permits nothing pure, nothing clean, nothing other than filth.” — Ermm… isn’t sex, on the whole, supposed to be a little “naughty”? And as for stains — these cannot be helped. That’s just plain old sex for you, dear! 😂

Like

They didn’t have Persil in Peter Damian’s day.
BTW I haven’t tried it myself but apparently hetero sex leaves a mess as well 🤢

Like

Well done to the policeman, keeping his cool and challenging these dangerous nutcases.
Wonder what his little female mate with the blond hair was there for? Equality?
She can’t speak or assist or intervene,?
But gets the same money. Oh dear.
Meanwhile Mcmahon looks like Emperor Bokassa at his coronation. What a sick abomination.
Easy enough to find out who these nutcases are Pat. Dept.of Social Security is your friend. Have a chat with psni away from camera.

Like

8.46, the female officer may have been a probationer: there to learn the ropes from a more experienced male colleague.

Like

Whatever she or he were, both better than the trash within An Garda Síochána.. Sooner FG cut their money the better and that’s coming from a public servant.

Like

Pat, you say “I also think that people should keep their religion for their home and their place of worship.”

Why then do you have a blog, appear in the media and harass these preachers by passive aggression by invading their personal space with a big sign. I bet you won’t sit with your sign outside the Free P church, or at mosques where similar views are held.

Like

+ Pat, in law that might well be the case, but speech and attitudes that demean and harm people of difference are always wrong, and should be challenged, whether it comes from Christian, Muslim, Jewish, any religion or none, or just out of plain ignorance and hatred. Let me tell you, if I was to say similar things about a Christian or a Muslim, they would be screaming blue murder, and the latter would probably want to throw me from a high building or chop off my head. These people have no right to denigrate and sow hatred at those that they do not agree with or understand, or just don’t like. I am always suspect of those who are most vociferous in their hate speech and attitudes. What are they covering up, hiding, denying, transferring ? Usually, it has something to do with themselves. I reckon those who are the most vociferous are gay themselves and just denying it. Anybody seen any of those characters in the photos down the cruising grounds, in the saunas and gay bars ? I bet they are quietly out and about.

Like

They are quoting the scriptures, they obviously believe in what they are doing. They are quite entitled to express their opinions even if you don’t like or agree with them. I admire and respect their courage.

Like

Doesn’t appear to be much of an audience or protest. The RUC men looked I’ll at ease. I didn’t hear any hate speech, just Bible quotations.

Like

9.11
I agree with your comment, except that the officers aren’t RUC, but PSNI. (Name-change about 20 years ago.)
Yes, I, too, heard no hate-speech (whatever that is) there; just scriptural references.
‘Hate-speech’ is a deeply illiberal, trendy, compound word whose meaning and usage is entirely arbitrary and seem intended to silence ANY point of view which offends the sensibilities of an individual, group, or demographic. It’s a way of using language to curb language: this is the kind of abuse (and it IS abuse) one might find in a totalitarian state.
Fine; if you want to protest what these preachers are proclaiming, then do so; but I draw a very firm line against trying to shut them up.
I hope the street preachers lodge a complaint with the Police Ombudsman: that officer who confiscated the microphone overstepped a mark, because as far as I could tell, no law had been broken.

Like

Name change same organisation. They are expressing their firmly held religious beliefs which they are quite entitled to. Pat probably rang the police to complain.

Like

I read the situation as being the preachers winding up the police. Right at the beginning of the video the officer asked them to stop preaching while they spoke to them. I thought the officer was unprepared to deal with the preachers because every interaction between street preachers and police has gone this way.
The preachers should have shut up while talking to the police from common courtesy.
The police officer should not have confiscated the microphone, and should have withdrawn from the escalating situation.
Basically the street preachers wound up the officer to make him do something wrong and he wasn’t equipped to deal with them escalating the situation.
My main thought would be if you have amplification like that your only real goal is to shout everyone else down and if you are recording it you are looking for publicity and confrontations.

Like

@ 9:42 am

Good post, MC.

The term “hate speech” is a weaponized term to shut down debate and free speech predominantly used by cultural Marxists and politically correct apparatchiks.

Like

Normal people have to put up with gay “pride” parades takibg over our streets, so the gays will have to put up with a few hurty words. Freedom of speech cuts both ways.

Like

10:05

They are all ex prisoners who have served between 10 and 20 years and constantly goad the police and cheer when the police leave.

They are at something else while pretending to be preachers.

Like

10.23

So because they street preach, they can’t be seeking employment? That’s a non-sequitur.

Like

“They are at something else while pretending to be preachers.” Reminds me of the ex-Lotta Continua.

Like

9:51 Gay pride parades take place in each location once a year and if you want a fair exchange that’s how often these people and bigots like you should be allowed to open their mouths.

Like

Man and woman coming together is part of the Natural Reproductive Order. As part of the Natural Reproductive Order, the LGBT community are most likely born from man and woman coming together.
In some peoples eagerness in today’s world for what they see as equality, they often overlook living in unity. Respect of differences should work two ways.
If people can’t see past the Natural Reproductive Order, they need to be respectful of differences. As the LGBT community come from the Natural Reproductive Order, there should be respect of that too and allow for respectful differences in respect of unity.
It should be acceptable that teaching is from the viewpoint of the Natural Reproductive Order but that differences are also respected.
(An aside point; when people are attracted to the same sex, they cannot naturally conceive a child between them. Instead of seeking external conception, they should embrace adoption in my humble opinion.)
Anecdotal evidence is that the clergy has an influx from the LGBT community. Have the LGBT community within the Church something to fear from a Church that would be more inclusive of LGBT parishioners?
The Church can define marriage as being between a man and woman in respect of the Natural Reproductive Order. There should however be a blessing of same sex unions.
Society needs to be careful that there is no pressure on the youth when it comes to gender and sexual identity.

Like

What’s wrong with Malcom McMahon?
He must be a great old grand old Queen to wear a 50 ft train – it’s so laden with flamboyant homosexuality it’s both hilarious and tragic.
You can whiff the repressed and even not so repressed homosexuality from where I’m standing.
Damian Thompson said the genie was out of the bottle with the Latin Mass Brigade – it might have been but it’s gone right back in.
Shame on McMahon – the LM is elitist, divisive, rebellious masquerading as loyalty and clearly a code for I’m Gay, Your Gay, All Priests are Gay.
For Fecks Sake take off the pink dress Malcom you ergitt!!

Like

11:33am
There is nothing wrong with Archbishop McMahon only in the eyes of an ould Queen like you. He was officiating at an ordination for the S.S. P. and was vested as all Bishop were before the horrendous Vat.II. You and your likes want to impose your divisive idea’s on everyone else with a contrary point of view. It wont happen, so feck off ya eejit!!!

Like

There is a disgusting scandal about to break in Liverpool, and McMahon is a very bad man. All will be revealed!

Like

11.56pm

Er, bit presumptive of you: I’m neither old or a Queen (slang for raging poofter).

Red blooded heterosexual here I’m afraid – Eve not Steve for me.

Er. I think you’ll find that’s the point, these vestments belong to an age that has passed, gone for ever, nostalgia isn’t religion and people who cling to it, cling to an idol.

Er, I don’t see Vatican as ‘horrendous ’ I see it as renewal, a bringing up to date, if you will.

Er, I don’t want to impose my will on anybody – Pope Francis has declared the Latin Mass divisive and elitist – I obey the Pope, do you?

Er, now let me get this strait (lace) – you are v likely a proponent of the Latin Mass, you’ve no doubt gone fully sourpussed up, no smile, no joy, content in your sense of superiority and sense of holy entitlement you and want me to, and I quote, ‘feck off you eegit.’

Er, I think my dear man, if I may speak in my mother tongue, the vernacular, you are the one Pope Francis has told to ‘feck off you eegit.’

Like

11:37pm

Er, I”ll take your word for your first statement.

Er, I don’t accept your second those vestments are not gone for ever, as you would wish, I see them every time I attend Holy Mass so it is not nostalgia.

Er, You might not see Vat.II as Horrendous I do, The so called “New Spring” that still has not sprung.

Er, you do want to impose your will on people who don’t want it and never will.

Er, You are right I am a proponent of The Latin Mass which makes me very happy and full of joy and smiling , no sourpuss here. I leave that to the likes of you with your sense of entitlement trying to impose on others to put up with with your happy clappy shite, not in a million.

Er, I think my dear man speaking in the venacular, I return to this dreadful Pope your last statement.

Like

I asked you to be honest but, on reflection, you should never trust a priest. Like most people, especially parents, I keep my distance. How many were in your congregation of old ladies at your imaginary Mass?

Like

11.53pm
Ah so you only obey the Pope when it suits – your a pick and mix Catholic- a deep red liberal who adores the Latin Mass and a bit of lace and frills and thrills.
Jeez I bet your in for a mile: pro condoms, pro abortion – what even anti the death penalty and same sex marriage – you rebel ya.
I’m a die hard traditional Catholic – love Mass in the vernacular, adore a folk Mass, love it when Father says ‘Call me by my first name’ and I think Pope Francis is really groovy.
I’m a little disappointed you didn’t tell me to ‘feck off you eegit’ but there’s still time yet. I’m a patient man.

Like

1:39pm
The very last thing I am is a liberal ya cretin. I approve of the death penalty and none of the other things you mention. you’re certainly not a die hard traditional Catholic if you love Mass in the venacular it’s not vernacular,. Is English you first languge? you love a folk mass and think ould Fanny is groovy and you want to be on first name terms with the clergy, you remind me of someone. I wonder who?

Like

1.15pm
Ah yes but for all your adherence to the LM convention – archaic, anachronistic and now outlawed – your post vibrates with malice, anger and foul language.
But that’s the beauty of the LMB it affords you the opportunity to ‘gay signal’ and we all know deep down you enjoy the erotic and phallic tension and charge the Latin Mass engenders – long phallic like robes. dresses concealing whiat titillates your repression and that delicious sense of hypocrisy underpinned by power plays, Dom v Sub vibe, uptight sexually naive acolytes and a homosexual sub culture if ever there was one – literally all dressed up with no where to go.
I bet you never leave Mass without a hard on or a little stiffy. What think we don’t know – get real – it’s all about sexual frisson.
Sometimes I think Buke is having an orgasm he seems so entranced by his altar boys. McMahon definitely does!!
Give me a folk Mass all day long.
If I wanted to experience a gay sub culture I’d go to a gay sauna, Soho or Canal St. But why would I, I’m like Ms Slocombe I prefer my pussies.

Like

2:38pm

I don’t think you’re like Mrs Slocombe at all, you sound that you’d be more at home in the gay sauna’s you mention, you know where they all are. The only pussies you know are the familiars you surround yourself with in your coven.

Like

Bella says this about anyone who disagrees with her or gets an insight into what she’s about.

Like

Pat I know you will disagree, but are you not a great person to talk, the amount of hate you write about day after day on your blog. It’s like at time reading something from the Westboro Baptist Church and their beliefs. All we read about is the failings of others or giving out about this priest or that bishop who you do not agree with.

Like

I don’t know how a blog post about the identity of preachers turned into a bitch-fest about tat. 😭

Like

3:20 pm:

The carta, oh I mean cappa magna, probably the work of poor Italian women to keep their children fed, was dusted off to show fairness and balance. Alas this led to attacks on ecclesiastical silk from the polyesters.

BTW, eBay’s Sacerdote, of merry memory, once told me he made a fortune supplying these guys with cappas and other finery.

Like

2.36pm
God love ya – your quite a tonic, truly a Prince among men, so classy and refined.
Is a cretin a lower caste than an eegit?
Your not a liberal – I’m shocked to my core – you must be a liberal you disagree with Pope Francis (only a repressed and frustrated homosexual would refer to the Holy Father as Fanny because you hate them – whereas I do love a friendly Fanny).
Wow – get you – you disapprove of killing an unborn child but are easy cum easy go about executing someone on death row – so life ain’t so precious after all right?
Of course English is in the vernacular- everything is vernacular except Latin.
I can feel the sexual tension building in you though – honestly take my word for it – I’m not your type – remember I’m for Eve not Steve.
I feel for you – you’ll miss the Latin Mass and your sexually charged liturgies and homophile gatherings masquerading as religion – I’ll ask Toby (Father insists I call him Toby) to pray for you at my next folk Mass where I play the tambourine.
Latin Mass – RIP

Like

I met Ena once at a Rosary Rally. It was a very hot day and being somewhat plump she was sweating heavily and her almost translucent Dominican habit was drenched. She had a somewhat acrid smell about her, a bit like unwiped bum. I guess there’s no sure way of telling someone they stink without offending them.

Like

3.34pm

Er, it’s v likely that who I am is a figment of your imagination -if it helps the narrative playing in your head about my sexual preference and your more comfortable imagining me as someone familiar with gay saunas, oh and knowing where they are (remarkable leap that one but I’m indulging you) and I’m involved in a covern or did you mean cavern – huge differences let me tell you.

I’m always amused that a poster like you describes the process of reading a post as hearing or sounding – it’s as if to suggest that your audibly hearing my post -‘sounds like’ whereas I think the only voice you hear are the voices in your head which have nothing to do with reality – so funny and entertaining -bearing in mind that I could be anything your imagination decides I am.

Gay, straight, bi, ambidextrous,amphibious, etc.

Like

You frequently claim people are coming off the gargle. You can get help for it, counselling for your attitude, and reading a catechism would teach you the rudiments of the faith.

Like

Yes, and that’s why all religions should focus on their own safeguarding instead of pointing to everyone else going, Look they’re as bad as us.

Like

Far more abuse takes place in non-religious institutions than in religious ones. How will MMM excuse that?

IICSA today reports that of all known institutions where offending had taken place, 11 percent (443 instances) were committed within a religious organisation or setting (89% not religious); and 10 percent of suspects (726 people) were employed by, or somehow linked to, a religious organisation or setting, and 90% were not.

Like

The attention should be on the children at far more risk in non-religious institutions, or maybe they don’t matter to you.

Like

To me, yes, but not to you. Your attention should be on the torture committed and facilitated by your church. If you have any conscience at all.

Like

7.56pm

Listen, NHS penpusher/desk jockey, sort out your side of the street. Look up Muckamore hospital in Northern Ireland, or the examples here:

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10718875/

The single-minded focus on abuse by priests lets the far more prevalent abuse elsewhere go unreported and undetected, and means, for example, that people have no idea at all that children are in lions’ dens when they go into children’s homes and hospitals.

Like

5.31: Does another horrible TRUTH about abuse in other places – homes etc……touch a raw nerve with you, daddy parent?? All abuse must be condemned. All.

Like

5.31: For you and for many others, abuse outside the church’s institutions aren’t of concern, you fool. Just look at the statistics. Read and research mire honestly.

Like

FYI I’m a safeguarding director in a large hospital lol.
However you are trying to divert again.
Nice try, but you’ve failed.
Hint: when your church and individuals like you begin to show any hint you’ve understood the impact of the church’s torture people like me will shut up. Until then we’ll carry on because you’re still in denial.

Like

The problems of society will impact on the Church. The clergy have come from society.
With the Church’s obsession with minimising scandal, it is always advisable to report any safeguarding concerns directly to the police.

Like

He doesn’t get it deaf guy and thinks that he can pretend to care about safeguarding as a diversion from clerical abuse.
It’s exactly the same person who keeps going on about social workers and (as above) MMM.
I really hope he’s a priest, because at the rate he and his ilk are going, they’ll be tagged and I would love to hear him moan.

Like

6:40 pm – believe your statement “The clergy have come from society” is reasonably wrong, if you excuse my saying so.
Most clergy are part of kind of “club” and to get in – and keep in – you have to show full allegiance to something other than Christ or the Gospels.
The writing is on the wall, I’m afraid.

Like

Anon at 5.12pm.

Had to butt in there on cos of what you have said up👆 there.

Dont you get it re damn lies on statistics.

Most of abuses went unreported or went under the radar. In my case, it wasnt reported to the gardai or the authorities until I made a complaint. There is a lot of under reported cases out there as we speak.

Lot of cases went to church straight away and settled from there. These cases weren’t reported at all to the state or police. They rcc kept it under wraps. Omerta is their code. There was one ex priest named Patrick Wall who spoke out. So we know from him, there were a lot of cases not being reported to the police or authorities.

Ergo statistics are useless in that respect. There was a famous quote I’m sure that you may heard of – ‘Lies, damned lies, and statistics’.

More importantly the first thing that abused or parents of the abused go straight to the police or secular authorities. So that it got reported and no longer under the radar. So authorities know what’s happening in rcc which was the case in USA.

By the way, are you a supporter of rcc🤔🤔🤔.

Like

9.12 pm anon.

LOLOL. 🤣🤣🤣

Until that post of 5.12pm stirred me up. 🙃

Like

I don’t understand who it would benefit or why you need to have the names and backgrounds of these guys. If they were prisoners and they have served their time, that is their business and while I find their message distasteful, I find the attempt to shut it down,by labelling it as hate speech, equally repellent.
They are not advocating the burning of homosexuals at the stake or the euthanising of persons with a disability; speech which could be called hate speech.
As someone mentioned earlier – invoking the crime of hate speech has become a way of shutting down ideas that we don’t like. I don’t think these men and women are guilty of hate speech – they are just sadly deluded.
Of course, they would think my idea that sex between loving same sex couples can be a thing that reflects the love of God for creation equally deluded. C’est La vie.
Best just let them spout their nonsense – either that or buy a microphone and speakers and start preaching your own version of Christianity at they same time. I imagine that no matter how inclusive you make it sound, the vast majority of people will just pass you by as they do these guys.

Like

5.12pm

Oh that’s OK then – how about this for an idea – just one child, one child sexually abused by a Roman Catholic priest, is one to many, and that one child and it’s cover up (there’s always cover up) is enough to bring the church to it’s knees.
Statistics are meaningless against this understanding which if your a RC priest your incapable of grasping.
Stalin said: One murder is a tragedy, a million is a statistic.’
You don’t understand the tragedy of one case of child abuse – it’s easier and consoling for you to compare statistics.

Like

5.40

Oh that’s OK then – how about this for an idea – just one child, one child sexually abused by an athiest social worker, is one to (sic) many, and that one child and it’s (sic) cover up (there’s always cover up) is enough to bring social services to it’s (sic) knees.
Statistics are meaningless against this understanding which if your (sic) social worker your (sic) incapable of grasping.
Stalin said: One murder is a tragedy, a million is a statistic.’
You don’t understand the tragedy of one case of child abuse – it’s easier and consoling for you to compare statistics

Like

You would have to be a real psychopath to have so little sensitivity as a Catholic as to fail to get it at this point, and attempt to point score over a retired social worker.
Forget the guys in the post at the top – we’ve got the real monster at 5:12, quite possibly of a Brendan Smyth or Oliver O’Grady level of psychopathy.

Like

Pat you will be aware that cathbots/clerics continue not to understand the significance and impact of the church’s abuse.
They continue to minimize it and deflect attention.
If they think it’s funny, they really are even worse than I thought. Whatever they are thinking, this remains an abusive response to the church’s actions and I know that you don’t want victims to be retraumatised here.
I know that you are a responsible person and as somebody who does understand the impact, just as you agree not to publish anti-vaccine comments I would ask you not to publish comments from RCs which attempt to deflect attention elsewhere from themselves, such as the one above.

Like

6:24pm Are you going to determine what is deflection, for debate and what is censored? No religious denomination operates in a vacuum. Did you think cover up occurred without secular assistance? How do you think cover up occurs in secular agencies or among secular professionals? Do you think church and state agencies might still be in collusion covering up scandals? If you believe victims or their relatives never reported to Policing Authorities in the past you are mistaken. By the way, no one mentioned anything was funny other than a one line post accusing another poster of same which was blatantly not the case- which leads me to believe an agenda maker is on the job. Before you get up on your high horse I’m not a priest or cathbot. Just sayin, like! 😎

Like

6.24: Pity about you! All clerics are not as you portray and all commenters are not clerics. You should have the intelligence to know that.

Like

6.53: It’s always difficult for haters to understand hatred!! Go figure, idiot. Stop lying.

Like

What strikes me in the comments today is the sheer anger and abusiveness of them.
I wonder what could be going through these people’s minds!
I have been rewatching Morgan Spurlock’s Where in the World is Osama Bin Laden. Everywhere he goes, Moslems tell him they would like to get hold of Bin Laden to put an end to the problems he was causing for all Moslems.
Compare and contrast.

Like

Still nobody has named Magna Carta and thus can’t substantiate the lies they tell that he was kicked out of seminary, I see.

Like

Actually there are far fewer priests so the level of spoiledness is decreasing.
Interestingly they keep saying they can name him. More LIES.

Like

9.32
(JEEEEZ!😩) No; I’m Frank Sinatra’s mother’s second cousin…on her friend’s side.

Like

Magna you didn’t come back at me for my ID comments a few days ago. I confirm no intention of revealing. We might get to meet one day for a natter, out by Paddy’s statue in the area called after that chap from Tarsus.
Keep ‘er lit!

Like

6.06pm
I should be flattered but strangely I’m not – and your point is? What atheists abuse children – who knew?
Roman Catholic clergy abuse children on an industrial scale – as a profession is a by word for paedophilia – its a haven for homosexuality, hypocrisy and industrial strength child abuse – one case should have been enough not tens of thousands – at least an atheist doesn’t believe in God whereas a priest claims to be his representative on earth. Go figure,
.

Like

But IICSA say children are far more at risk in non-religious institutions and the vast majority of perpetrators are non-religious. Why do these facts enrage you? Should IICSA suppress them?

Like

Except that’s not the point you’re making.
You genuinely think this is funny, don’t you.

Like

Take it up with IICSA. Don’t shoot the messenger. None of this is funny, I don’t know anyone who thinks it is. People should be proportionatly furious about abuse everywhere and demand its eradication everywhere, and not allow abuse in non-churchbsettings be ignored or denied and thus go on, hidden in plain sight, unreported and with no public outrage to get it fixed.

Like

Nah. You’re just trying to divert from your own setting. You really are a nasty piece of work.

Like

I saw Pat and John Hume (both RIP) reverently hearing the TLM in Long Tower church, celebrated by Fr Roland Colhoun.

Like

That poor, troubled lady in Strabane who won millions on the lottery also died today, tragically at her own hands, it seems. RIP.

Like

When was the last time anyone here talked to a priest? I avoid them like the plague and my skin crawls if one is nearby.

Like

9.20: Despicable hatred. Come try me…you’d be pulled apart….just joking. ☻☻💀👹💀👺👹👿..Your comment is ugly and satanic.

Like

9.20. I just find them pathetically anaemic, out of touch with the reality of human life, uninspiring, and parasitically inclined.
I take little to do with them or their affairs. My family have strict orders to have no clerical involvement after my final curtain call.

Like

Gosh it makes me sick re cappa Magna in photo in Liverpool . I couldn’t stand it when I saw it first time re mother Burke was in Ireland. cos it screams for pure attention and sheer colours.
I remember asking myself why are they dressed up like that in this day and age. NO NEED for that cos jesus never wore it on himself. What had brought it on re cappa Magna? It’s irrelevant in this day and age. Does that indicates that rcc out of touch with us? Rcc as they in medival age as ourselves in modern age .
Growing chasm between them (rcc) and us indeed😉

Like

9.54pm anon.
LOLOL. Its same story but I avoid it as much as I can in case mother Burke might return. I read somewhere that his grandparents were from cork and Limerick which I didn’t know.

Like

He is off the ventilator and is on the mend. Not a word of prayer or public comment on a gravely ill cardinal came from His Humbleness.

Like

Anon at 10.05pm

Poster at 5.12pm stirred me up in a hornet nest. 🙃🙃.

Like I said before that I would read it from time to time until that post of 5.12.

Like

I used to get annoyed by Protestant preachers and missionaries who went out of their way to convert Catholics, but now I believe it is God’s work to draw people out of the Catholic Church, which is a bar and impediment to a true Christian life.

Like

My favorite bible passage is the one where Jesus says to the apostles, Try to run the church like a corporation so nobody notices if you’re just the same as everyone else. And don’t write anything down.

Like

10.00
My two favourite bible passages after your tedious interventions.
1. And Judas went and hanged himself and his bowels burst forth.
2. And the lot fell on Matthias.

Like

Leave a comment