I am a longstanding priest of the Diocese of Waterford and Lismore.
I pen this after much thought and prayer and after discussions with colleagues.
Our diocese is being destroyed by a tyrant and a bully – Phonsie Cullinan.
Since he arrived our good name has been dragged through the mud by his irrational and right wing pronouncements on matters such as the cervical cancer preventative vaccine for girls and his antideluvian pronouncements on matters like yoga.
FR RICHARD GEOGHEGAN:
FATHER RICHARD
In the recent past he has bullied Father Richard into signing an application to Rome for laicisation. Richard always wanted to be a priest and was always a good priest. If you want to, visit Carrick on Suir and ask about him.
He has always been totally pastoral and famous for his punctuality. Children and adults loved his short but straight to the point homilies. He kept parish books and registers to perfection.
Richard also endeared himself to all with his humanity, his sense of humour, his non clerical friendliness and his involvement in parish events, pantomimes and dramas.
Yes, he was and is “different” – but in the very best of ways. Some say he is eccentric? But how refreshing a relief that is from the black suit and never smiling brigade.
He is a very sensitive man and Phonsie spotted that from the beginning and used it against Richard. Richard likes to be called Richard. But Phonsie taunted him by calling him “Richie”.
Phonsie made a point of sending for Richard after dark and we know that after some of those meetings Richard emerged to both cry and vomit.
Richard is a people person. Phonsie appointed him to a very isolated parish which had been left in a horrible state by his predecessor. Richard was driven, to attempt suicide an attempt that thankfully did not end in his death.
Phonsie often reminded him of that dark hour in a most unkind and non pastoral fashion.
Even at Confirmations now many children don’t want their children photographed with Phonsie.
Since he arrived Phonsie has always had a number of young men and women living with him in his house. Creepy! What is this about?
SUPPORT OF RICHARD PURCELL
None of us can understand the strange relationship between Phonsie and the now deposed Richard Purcell.
Phonsie supported him to the bitter end.
What was all this really about?
We know how much you love Waterford and Lismore. You finished your training in our seminary. You were ordained in our cathedral 46 years ago.
You were a lifelong friend of our Monsignor John Shine. And he thought as much of you as you did of him.
JOHN SHINE RIP
We were absolutely appalled at how Phonsie treated you at Monsignor Shine’s funeral by creating a totally unChristian scene and refusing you Holy Communion.
He even called for some of the priests present on the sanctuary to physically remove you from the church. My God!
Bishop Russell who ordained you was a gentleman. Bishop Lee was a good pastor to his priests.
Phonsie often says that you, Pat are “pure evil”.
But the priests and people of Waterford know who the truly evil one is – and its not you, dear Pat.
Even the retired Bishop Lee dreads Phonsie’s lunch invitations and offer those occasions up for the souls in Purgatory.
Please continue your close scrutiny of Cullinan so that we might soon be free of him.
With the kindest regards,
Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx
Waterford and Lismore”.
PAT
Dear Brother,
Thank you for your most welcome and self explanatory email.
I’ve known from the beginning that Phonsie was a disastrous appointment.
Now that clergy, parents and even the bishop emeritus are expressing frustration and angst things are really gathering pace.
On Friday, the California Court of Appeal for the Fifth District handed down two separate rulings rejecting Harrison’s claims for defamation. The court reversed lower court rulings in Harrison’s favor and ordered that he pay attorneys’ fees and other costs in each case.
Harrison had filed the lawsuits in 2019 against Stephen Brady of Roman Catholic Faithful, a whistleblower group that exposes clerical corruption; and Ryan Gilligan, a former monk and associate of Harrison who accused him of homosexual grooming.
This makes Harrison’s third loss in court, after a judge in May 2021 dismissed his defamation lawsuit against the diocese of Fresno.
Harrison, ordained in 1987, is credibly accused by at least seven victims of homosexual abuse. In 2019, Gilligan was among several accusers who came forward publicly, leading to increased media scrutiny of Harrison’s case, including a 2019 press conference held by Brady’s Roman Catholic Faithful in California.
In both of Friday’s rulings, the court found that the comments made by Brady and Gilligan were protected speech:
Brady and his organization, Roman Catholic Faithful, Inc., work to uncover evidence of sexual misbehavior by Catholic priests and Brady claimed to be seeking the truth regarding these allegations. For the reasons set forth below, we conclude that the allegedly defamatory statements identified by Harrison are protected by the fair report privilege … .
The impetus for the lawsuit is the claim by appellant that Harrison subjected him to inappropriate sexual advances, acted inappropriately with children, and sexually abused at least one minor child. … For the reasons set forth below, we conclude that the allegedly defamatory statements identified by Harrison are protected by the fair report privilege … .
“All I ever did was speak my truth,” Gilligan said in comments to Church Militant, “and all I want now is Craig Harrison and his attorneys to leave my family and me alone.”
On Friday, the California Court of Appeal for the Fifth District handed down two separate rulings rejecting Harrison’s claims for defamation. The court reversed lower court rulings in Harrison’s favor and ordered that he pay attorneys’ fees and other costs in each case.
Harrison had filed the lawsuits in 2019 against Stephen Brady of Roman Catholic Faithful, a whistleblower group that exposes clerical corruption; and Ryan Gilligan, a former monk and associate of Harrison who accused him of homosexual grooming.
This makes Harrison’s third loss in court, after a judge in May 2021 dismissed his defamation lawsuit against the diocese of Fresno.
Harrison, ordained in 1987, is credibly accused by at least seven victims of homosexual abuse. In 2019, Gilligan was among several accusers who came forward publicly, leading to increased media scrutiny of Harrison’s case, including a 2019 press conference held by Brady’s Roman Catholic Faithful in California.
In both of Friday’s rulings, the court found that the comments made by Brady and Gilligan were protected speech:
Brady and his organization, Roman Catholic Faithful, Inc., work to uncover evidence of sexual misbehavior by Catholic priests and Brady claimed to be seeking the truth regarding these allegations. For the reasons set forth below, we conclude that the allegedly defamatory statements identified by Harrison are protected by the fair report privilege … .
The impetus for the lawsuit is the claim by appellant that Harrison subjected him to inappropriate sexual advances, acted inappropriately with children, and sexually abused at least one minor child. … For the reasons set forth below, we conclude that the allegedly defamatory statements identified by Harrison are protected by the fair report privilege … .
“All I ever did was speak my truth,” Gilligan said in comments to Church Militant, “and all I want now is Craig Harrison and his attorneys to leave my family and me alone.”
“All I ever did was speak my truth,” Gilligan said in comments to Church Militant, “and all I want now is Craig Harrison and his attorneys to leave my family and me alone.”
Harrison posing for a selfie at a 2021 “Reflections for Women”
talk he gave to a packed house at Bakersfield’s Fox Theater
“I am very grateful,” said Brady in remarks to Church Militant. “This suit delayed all my other work to some degree, to say nothing of legal fees, which we now hope to recover.”
Brady has had to spend more than $100,000 in legal costs defending himself in this litigation.
“The best thing, as far as I’m concerned, is that now I can get back to my work without worrying about this nonsense,” Brady added.
“We are pleased with the two rulings issued by the Fifth District Court of Appeals finding that Craig Harrison’s separate lawsuits against our clients should both be dismissed under California’s Anti-SLAPP statute,” said attorneys Paul Jonna and Jeffrey Trissell, who represented Brady and Gilligan.
“California’s Anti-SLAPP statute was intended to dispose of frivolous and baseless lawsuits just like the ones Mr. Harrison filed against our clients,” they noted. “To disincentivize such baseless lawsuits, the Anti-SLAPP statute provides that a prevailing defendant’s attorneys’ fees must be paid by the losing plaintiff.”
“We will now seek to recover from Mr. Harrison the substantial attorneys’ fees that our clients have incurred during this process,” they added.
Multiple Accusers
The diocese placed Harrison on leave in April 2019 after a man accused the priest of abusing him when he was a 16-year-old altar boy. Other accusers also came forward, including Gilligan.
“I was in Fr. Craig’s inner circle from 2011 to 2016 and am a victim of his inappropriate touching, lies, manipulation and abuse of power,” said Gilligan in a public statement.
“I witnessed him being inappropriate with children, giving gifts/money, saying sexual jokes, touching, and being alone with them,” he continued. “I have also witnessed him taking advantage and controlling the lives of younger men entrusted to him that have had drug or alcohol problems.”
In a statement to the Bakersfield Police Department in May 2021, Gilligan related to police instances of Harrison’s alleged inappropriate activity, including:
Touching of genitals
Pornography
Telling of homosexual jokes
Blackmailing him to keep silent by threatening to reveal sins he confessed
In response, Harrison smeared Gilligan as a liar and an alcoholic. Gilligan stood by his claims and expressed little surprise that Harrison would try to discredit him by destroying his reputation.
Harrison was initially accused of abuse more than 20 years ago, in 1998, by a male teen who lived in the rectory of St. Joseph’s Catholic Church in Firebaugh. He claimed Harrison would inspect his genitals each night under the pretext that it would reveal whether the boy was doing drugs.
The allegation is identical to that of another boy who lived in one of Harrison’s homes for troubled teens.
Most of the alleged victims are Latino males from troubled backgrounds.GabTweet
A 2004 report obtained by Church Militant written by former FBI agent Tom Walsh quotes a former resident of one of the boys’ homes, who relayed that “every morning Harrison lined up all the boys who were residing in the house and examined each boy’s testicles with a flashlight. Telling them that by doing this he could tell if any one of them was using narcotics.”
Harrison’s alleged conduct is also identical to two other accusers who have more recently stepped forward, saying Harrison would also inspect their genitals, using the same reasons. Another accuser claims Harrison pinned him against the wall and rubbed his erect penis against him.
Most of the alleged victims are Latino males from troubled backgrounds.
The 2004 FBI investigator’s report goes on to detail evidence of at least one suicide of a boy who lived with Harrison.
PAT SAYS
This case from the US is a strong reminder to us that many gay priests are involved in the deliberate “grooming” of young men in their parishes and communities, including and especially in Ireland.
This problem is a real facet of the priestly gay issues in the Archdiocese of Armagh and other Irish dioceses.
It has also being a feature of life in Silverstream monastery.
BISHOP PAT BUCKLEY 